Do you have a video playback issues?
Please disable AdBlocker in your browser for our website.
Due to a high volume of active users and service overload, we had to decrease the quality of video streaming. Premium users remains with the highest video quality available. Sorry for the inconvinience it may cause. Donate to keep project running.
Change just a couple of things -- and granted, they're major things -- and you'd have a satisfying and textured ghost story... The first thing that would have to change is the acting. It is, in a word, awful.
A screen adaptation of a book can respect the original text and still be terrible. It can respect the author's wishes and still be terrible. Still, few adaptations are as openly awful as the TV version of The Shining.
Perhaps the flawed gem that is Stephen King's The Shining could never hope to match the greatness of Kubrick's film. Yet it still stands as a worthy companion piece.
Mr. King's script and the direction of Mick Garris slowly and skillfully bring The Shining to a pitch of screeching horror. Mr. Weber, shucking the light comedy of sitcom, is chillingly effective.
It's torture. It's hell. And millions will tune in, attracted by King's reputation as America's scaremaster... The best thing would be for everybody to avoid it like the plague, because it is the plague.
The running time unwisely inflates this intimate story of a three-member family coming apart at the isolated hotel in the Colorado Rockies. The Stand was an epic. The Shining is not.