Do you have a video playback issues? Please disable AdBlocker in your browser for our website.
Due to a high volume of active users and service overload, we had to decrease the quality of video streaming. Premium users remains with the highest video quality available. Sorry for the inconvinience it may cause. Donate to keep project running.

Watch Ironclad: Battle For Blood

Oops...

Something went wrong.

Try again later.

  • Get premium account and watch without any limits!

    Close
    • Reset
  •   Report
  •  Trailer
Gathered together by young Hubert (Tom Rhys Harries), a small band of hired swords gather inside his families castle intent on holding off evil Celtic Tribesmen hell-bent on revenge for the death of their leaders'; son: a young mercenary named Guy (Tom Austen) whose soul is wracked with guilt over the atrocities he has committed during the days and years after the great battle of Rochester Castle and his burgeoning feelings for Kate, his cousin (Roxanne McKee), ; battle-hardened mercenaries such as Berenger (David Caves), who fight not for God and country for money and bloodlust.  
  • Comments
  • Newest
    • Newest
    • Oldest
  • 0 Comments
  • YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
  • ACTORS OF "Ironclad: Battle For Blood"
  • DIRECTORS OF "Ironclad: Battle For Blood"
  • CREATORS OF "Ironclad: Battle For Blood"
  • HEROES OF "Ironclad: Battle For Blood"
  • CRITICS OF "Ironclad: Battle For Blood"
Michael Nordine
Battle for Blood is ultimately too accurate a subtitle; this film is a bloodbath, and not an edifying one in the slightest.
July 22, 2014
Maitland McDonagh
Battle for Blood continues to make 13th-century England look like a truly wretched place to live or, more often, die in. But while it delivers some strong battle sequences, the characters are less vividly drawn than in its predecessor.
July 24, 2014
Leslie Felperin
Essentially 108 minutes of woad-daubed Scots and begrimed English settlers slogging it out over a castle on the Scottish border in 1221.
July 22, 2014
Ed Whitfield
It has the feel of a follow up that English either helmed so no one else could or was desperate to make, despite a lack of interest from financiers and agents.
March 20, 2014
Todd Jorgenson
It throws historical accuracy out the window even more than its predecessor.
July 25, 2014
Brian Orndorf
Attempting to cover up production constraints, English makes Battle for Blood visually worthless at times, which doesn't help the picture's ongoing fatigue as it gradually runs out of shock value and fascinating characters.
July 10, 2014
Trevor Johnston
Much sound and fury ensues, but without a compelling story behind it, it signifies very little.
March 12, 2014
Matt Glasby
What should have been a quick, exciting medieval skirmish starts to feel like the 100 Years War.
March 10, 2014
Chris Klimek
...a grisly, humorless, tension-free, badly shot slog of a sorta-sequel.
July 23, 2014
Robert Abele
The title's promise of violence is dutifully met in gory, sonically squishy close-quarter melees shot in Confuse-o-vision, as if the camera had been strapped to a whirring blender before the footage was edited with the puree button.
July 24, 2014
Feedback about this page?

Feedback about this page?