I didn't start making films until I was 34. But that wasted youth was probably the most valuable asset for what I'm doing now. You see the world, you end up in jail three or four times, you accumulate experience. And it gives you something to say. If you don't have anything to say then you shouldn't be making films. It's nothing to do with what lens you're using. Show less «

Occasionally I still get shit offered to me. I think that people who would have the temerity to work with me know they're in for a ride, and I'm proud of that. I'm not even a cinematographer. I'm a collaborator. Show less «

I went to Taiwan to study Chinese and, as usual, I hung out in bars, and people in bars are usually musicians and artistic kinds of people. I had accumulated a little life experience so I could articulate things which were a little bit more complex than I could actually do and for some reason Edward Yang trusted me. And then we made this film ("That Day on the Beach," 1983) that won all these awards and I didn't know what I was doing. I fluked it. Show less «

I went to France and tried to learn cinematography. Then I realized that I didn't care. So I came back to making films as I could. I think I started to know what I was doing in the middle of "Days of Being Wild" (in 1991). You can't learn how to make films. You gotta make mistakes and you have to appropriate the mistakes, and then you learn from those things. Then you have a voice. Show less «

My best film is always my next film. I couldn't make Chungking Express now, because of the way I live and drink I've forgotten how I did it. I don't believe in film school or film theory. Just try and get in there and make the bloody film, do good work and be with people you love. Show less «

[on the digital revolution in filmmaking] I think it's fantastic, I think this is the most astonishing period of film history. And I should say: just do it. Kids! Just fucking do it. There used to be a time where you had to do this and this and this, and you had to save up enough money to buy an 8mm camera and film and send it all to process...now you just turn on your phone and you're on CNN if you want, or you're making a film. I think it's fantastic. The point is not about the materials. It's the ideas, the energy, the collaboration. It's how you express yourself. (...) It's a personalization, and that's fantastic, because then you're not going to pretend to be Spielberg or Chris Doyle, you're going to be who you are and that will have a voice of its own that will resonate.[2014] Show less «

Nothing's perfect... and it's in the imperfection there is possibility.

The idea is becoming a blueprint. The visual aspect of film is expanding, we're evolving a new relationship with film-making over here [Asia]. I really think we've moved beyond all that auteur theory. People will have to come up with a different theory for what we're doing here. Show less «

I left Australia when I was 18 and I've been a foreigner for 36 years. I think that's very important to the way I work because as a foreigner you see things differently. But I started making Chinese-language films so I regard myself as a Chinese filmmaker. I just happen to be white. Or pink, actually. Show less «

I've done like 15 films this year and they were all like 3 or 4 days, and I think this is the future. You have a focus, you collect a group of people, you get support and you just go for it.[2014] Show less «

I was born five months after my parents were married, so I understand why mistakes have informed my world. Show less «

I think what we're doing here [Asia] is much more valid. We've got half the world's population here. The implications are as evident as they would be for the French New Wave. Show less «

I was born Australian but I'm more Francis Bacon than Mel Gibson, who is the antithesis of me. Actually, I always wanted to be the Mick Jagger of cinema but I think I'm the Keith Richards, by force of habit, perhaps. Show less «

The East is rising and the energy of the region is reflected in everything we do here, whether commercial, military or cinematic. I just happen to be part of that. We're in a golden age of cinematography. Most people are on-line at least four hours a day. They're seeing images all the time and their visual sophistication is jumping far beyond all the old farts in the Academy. Show less «

I feel that 2046 (2004) is unnecessary, in retrospect. I think probably Kar-Wai Wong realized that somewhere, and that's why it took so long. You do realize that you have basically said what you needed to say, so why say more? I feel that way. I think you have to move on. Show less «

But their gravity is money. Which is fine, just go ahead, but I don't feel much a part of that because of all the other bullshit that comes with it. It's a political movement basically, coming with all the complications, all the bureaucracy and all the accountants. It's like the guy who did The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian (2008) I just happened to be in Poland, doing a small film that I wrote and directed in Warsaw [Warsaw Dark (2009)], and there's a party for "Narnia 2", like, the opening, I don't know what. And the guy comes up to me and says, "Chris, I'm going through hell." And I say why, and he says "278 million dollars budget. It's not a film, I'm dealing with accountants the whole time, it's all about the money. After this," he says, "I'm not gonna do anything over 30 million dollars!" [Doyle laughs uproariously] Like that was nothing! But we're gonna struggle in the trenches, because ultimately I think how many bloody remakes of things can you watch? That's going to shift, the demographic will shift, and then those poor fuckers will have to come back to us. It's happened always: it happened in the '60s in American film, you have Easy Rider (1969). It happened with the New Wave. You sell your popcorn and your shit, and then they'll see everyone's online watching these really great films watching made by young people in Indonesia or Burma, and fuck your special effects. And then the money people will say "oh shit, too much is happening online" and of course they have to chase the money, but by that stage the money will be us.[2014] Show less «

What I'm trying to do is make the camera-work lyrical rather than fragmentary. It's a dance between the camera and the actors. Show less «

Looks like we got it right on Hero and if you get it right the eye connects directly with the heart, doesn't matter what the language is. But Hollywood has fallen into making mechanistic, assembly-line movies. Now they have to steal ideas from Asia because that's where the originality is. I have a very strong identification with Asia, there's a different type of energy there, and I had a delayed adolescence in China so I feel I grew up there. Show less «

I really think music and movement - dance, you know - and literature inform my visuals. I think film is also based in dance. The relationship between me, the camera and the actor is always a dance. Show less «

For years most people didn't know I wasn't yellow. Du Ke Fung [his Chinese name] means `like the wind'. It's an extremely poetic name, as opposed to this piece of shit sitting before you. So this person called Du Ke Fung with no past or parents or ID card makes the films and at night he turns back into this drunkard called Chris Doyle. Show less «

My closest friends are all either filmmakers or musicians. And so that's why that is. It's very rare that a 'filmmaker filmmaker' approaches me. It's always a friend who says "oh, let's make a film together." Which is really great, because then the intimacy or the complicity, whatever you call it, is there already. So you don't have to work on the "film" part of it, and you don't have to have the meetings or the discussions about style and all that kind of crap. You just go for it, because you know each other in a more basic and more integral way.[2014] Show less «